The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant, around 18:00 on January 31, 2012, at the home of the Defendant’s head located in Seoyang-gun, Namyang-gun, and on the ground that the victim D (the victim D) lent 20 million won to E, the father of the Defendant, demanded repayment of the victim’s 20 million won, and took a bath for the victim, the Defendant took care of the victim’s head at the right her head by an insular tool located therein for about 14 days.

2. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, as stated in the foregoing facts charged, there was no fact that the victim D (hereinafter “victim”) was not guilty, the prosecutor also asserts that “the Defendant is not guilty” in the old-end written opinion dated May 31, 2013.

As such, it is difficult to recognize the credibility of the victim's statement because the victim's legal statement is in conflict with the victim's statement made by himself/herself and the witness F's legal statement, which is his/her wife, in an investigative agency. Otherwise, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged in the instant case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it differently.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the latter part of Article 325