1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 8, 2017, the Plaintiff driven a B rocketing car on March 20:20, and changed the course to one lane while driving a three-lane road in front of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from the direction of the National Cemetery to the direction of Black Station. The Plaintiff, as a result of the Plaintiff’s breach of the duty of safety driving, committed a collision with the E franchise operated by the victim D, who was driving on a one-lane one-lane, following the top wheeler of the car and the part which the Plaintiff driven.

The Plaintiff, as a result of the foregoing accident, got injured by the victims F, such as injuries that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victims G of the same passenger as those who moved in the vehicle with the victim D and the franchise, and got injured by the number of days of medical treatment to the victims G, but failed to immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victims.

B. On April 20, 2017, the Defendant issued a disposition to revoke the Plaintiff’s driver’s license (Class II ordinary) (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff caused the instant traffic accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) and did not take necessary measures, such as threatening victims and aiding victims.

C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition, but the said claim was dismissed on July 4, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry in Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff did not have any intention to flee because it did not recognize the occurrence of the said accident. Therefore, there is no reason to dispose of the instant disposition. (2) The Plaintiff did not recognize the occurrence of the instant accident, and the Plaintiff did not recognize the occurrence of the instant accident. The Plaintiff’s driver’s license is essential to maintain his livelihood, and the Plaintiff flicks and her mother flick.