1. The Defendant’s KRW 77,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from April 1, 2014 to September 15, 2015, and September 16, 2015.

1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant, on March 20, 2013, issued by the Plaintiff on March 20, 2013, published an advertisement on the game products sold by the Defendant on April 4 through 12 occasions from March 2014 to March 12, 2014, and the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff the price of KRW 7,00,00,000 including value-added tax, and the Plaintiff’s advertisement on the instant game products in accordance with the instant advertising contract to be paid simultaneously with the publication (hereinafter “instant advertising contract”), and the fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not dispute with each other, or acknowledged the purport of the entire pleadings in full view of the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 1, evidence No. 2 through No. 13, and evidence No. 13, and each statement No. 2, respectively.

2. The defendant's defense that the act of the non-party D, the former representative director of the defendant, concluded the advertisement contract of this case, regardless of the profit of the defendant company, abused his authority for the purpose of promoting the interest of the plaintiff, the representative director of the plaintiff, the non-party E, and the husband non-party D, and the plaintiff, the other party to the act, knew or could have known the intention of D, so the advertisement contract of this case is null and void against the defendant.

First of all, it appears in the argument of this case as to whether the conclusion of the advertising contract of this case was unrelated to the profit of the defendant company, and in particular, the defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of the game development and sales business, and the defendant entered into an advertising contract with the defendant's fee publishing the defendant's advertising in the publication of this case from July 2006. The publication of this case also includes the defendant's advertising as well as advertising articles.