1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall include the part resulting from the participation in the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs are residents residing in G in Kimpo-si, and the defendant is an administrative agency that has accepted the Intervenor's report on the installation of a memorial hall and the report on the installation of a memorial cemetery.

B. On December 13, 2007, the Defendant acquired the Intervenor’s charnel facilities, and the Defendant, from C, a member of the A religious organization, on December 13, 2007, “the instant charnel facilities” in total, including the charnel houses, temples, and charnel tombs on the three-story D ground surface in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter the above charnel facilities, temples, and charnel tombs, and combined with the relevant site, “the instant charnel facilities and their sites”.

2) On August 14, 2013, the instant charnel facility and site were awarded a successful bid and acquired ownership on the instant charnel facility and site. The instant charnel facility and site were accepted.

3) After November 22, 2013, F donated the instant charnel facility and site to the Intervenor as his/her representative, and the ownership transfer registration was completed under the name of the Intervenor. C. The Defendant reported the revocation of permission for use of the private charnel facility (report) and the closure of the charnel facility. The previous owner of the religious organization, upon the authoritative interpretation of the Ministry of Health and Welfare that the new owner shall file a report of closure and file a report of closure with C on November 25, 2013, and C accepted the report on the closure of the charnel facility on December 10, 2013, upon reporting the closure of the charnel facility to the Defendant on December 10, 2013, and the Defendant received the report on the alteration of the charnel house and the charnel house in the name of the Intervenor. On December 9, 2013, the Intervenor sought opinions on the modification of the instant charnel facility to the Defendant as the manager of the religious organization and the military unit manager of the Gyeonggi-do Association, and then sought his/her opinion on the modification of the military unit 14.