The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person driving B-learning automobiles.

On November 07, 2016, around 09:00, the Defendant changed the course to four-lanes while driving around about 60km along three-lanes from the waterside to the waterside transfer side.

In this case, there was a duty of care to safely change lanes by notifying the direction of direction in advance and keeping the traffic situation of the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and instead received the front part of the victim D(32) driving E in the case of the victim D(32) driving at the top of the four-lane, and received the front part of the car on the left side of the vehicle.

Defendant 1 suffered, by its occupational negligence, the injury to the victim, such as finite finites, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the victim F (26 years of age) who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, and G (1 year of age) which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

In this case, on May 31, 2017, the victims expressed explicitly their intention not to punish the defendant after the institution of each indictment of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.