The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below recognized the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's violation of the Road Traffic Act at around 1997, and there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that there is no force of criminal punishment except for the defendant sentenced to a fine of one million won due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act. However, these circumstances are all considered at the court below's trial and there is no change in circumstances at the same time. Meanwhile, the defendant's use of loans equivalent to KRW 418,500,000 by stealing the name of the female and female head of the F branch of the Bank of the victim bank as the head of the F branch of the bank, and there is no reason to believe that the defendant's use of loans equivalent to KRW 418,500,000 for personal use is poor, and the defendant is not able to recover most of the damages used for his personal use even until the trial. In light of the motive and circumstances leading up to the defendant's crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and environment, etc., the above assertion by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.