The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of seven years and the completion of 80 hours for sexual assault treatment programs) is too large and thus the amount of the punishment is unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant submitted multiple counter-instigious questions at the appellate court, there was no other submission of new data on sentencing, the sentencing conditions of the appellate court changed compared to those of the lower court.

It is difficult to see it.

In full view of all the sentencing factors revealed at the trial of this case, the lower court’s punishment is excessively heavy to the extent that it exceeded the reasonable discretion of the court.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is so dismissed as per Disposition.