Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 11. 11. 19:00 경 인천 부평구 B에 있는 ‘C 노래방’ 입구 계단에서 자신의 처와 알고 지내던 피해자 D( 여, 21세) 와 부부 동반 모임을 하던 중 바람을 쐬기 위해 위 노래방 입구 계단에 앉아 있던 피해자의 옆에 나란히 앉은 다음 피해자의 손을 만지고, 피해자의 가슴을 만지면서 피해자의 입술에 입맞춤을 하고, 이를 거부하는 피해자의 입술에 다시 입맞춤을 하는 등 그녀를 강제로 추행하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as places and photographs of crimes;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 298 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act only has the record of being punished three times for the reason of the sentencing of this case, and the degree of the indecent act in this case is not much serious as the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant, and the fact that it is not agreed with the victim is not agreed with the victim, shall be determined as the sentencing factors unfavorable to the defendant, taking into account all of the sentencing factors such as the age, sex, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime.

Where the registration of personal information and conviction of a defendant to be submitted are finalized, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 42 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the head of the competent police office pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

The defendant's age, occupation, risk of recidivism, type and motive of the crime of this case, process of the crime, order of disclosure and notification, and employment restriction order can be achieved due to the extent and expected side effects of the disadvantage of the defendant's entrance.