1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as follows, except where the plaintiff added the following judgments with respect to the conjunctive claim added at the trial of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing it as it is by the main sentence

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. The main point of the argument is that the defendant, as the representative director B of the first instance joint defendant corporation, issued a registration certificate and a certificate of personal seal impression that the plaintiff would guarantee the plaintiff's obligation to pay for the goods of the above company as the plaintiff discontinued the transaction of the above company. This constitutes a tort by deceiving the plaintiff.

Therefore, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages equivalent to KRW 48,193,866.

B. According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 3, it is recognized that the plaintiff has the defendant's certificate of personal seal impression.

However, as long as there is no evidence to prove that the defendant agreed to guarantee the above company's goods payment obligation to the plaintiff, the plaintiff's assertion on this part is without merit.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance as to the primary claims is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claims added in the trial are all dismissed.