A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. The Defendant around September 2014, within the E cafeteria of the Victim C’s Operation of Ma, the Defendant intends to pay the victim “in lieu of the pet F’s debt” to the victim.

The 50 million won will be lent to 20 months in one month while working at a restaurant on the Myeon of the State.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, there is no particular property at the time, and the monthly income is merely 1.8 million won, while the debt is about 6,500 to 75 million won, so even if borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

As above, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim on September 7, 2014; (b) KRW 4 million from the victim’s new bank account with the creditor G on September 15, 2014; (c) KRW 2 million from the said account on September 22, 2014; (d) KRW 10 million from the said account on September 30, 2014; and (e) KRW 6 million from the said account on September 30, 2014; (c) KRW 10 million from the Defendant’s postal account with the Defendant’s creditor’s corporate bank account on the same day; and (d) KRW 3743,8430,000 from the said account on November 21, 2014 to the said account on the aggregate of KRW 3843,3830,000,000 in total; (e) is clear that the said account is a total of KRW 38430,000.

of this case, he received remittance and acquired it.

B. The Defendant, at the foregoing place around July 2015, demanded that the said victim pay money in lieu of the money that he/she purchased and distributed the cosmetics of the I Cosmetics Company, and then borrowed from the proceeds therefrom. The Defendant would have to pay money on or before September.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the above paragraph (a) was in the same situation as the above, and even if the cosmetics were sold on credit, the victims did not have the intention or ability to pay the purchase price of the cosmetics even if they were paid the purchase price of the cosmetics.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and let the victim bear the cosmetics from July 30, 2015 to August 31, 2015.