1. The defendant shall accept on December 17, 2008 the land indicated in the attached list from the Suwon District Court as to the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The land survey division prepared by the Joseon General Co., Ltd. and the provisional land survey division is indicated as C’s assessment on May 9, 191 (hereinafter “instant land”) in the Gyeonggi-do No. 195 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). The C’s address is Dluri (the land survey division is indicated as E, but it appears to be a clerical error).

B. The Gyeonggi-do Authenticity-gun was changed on April 1, 1989 by its administrative district to Pyeongtaek-si Gri.

C. On July 13, 2007, the head of Pyeongtaek-si publicly announced that the Defendant acquired ownership when there is no report on the right within the public notice period with respect to the land, etc. of this case as H of Pyeongtaek-si public announcement, and that the Defendant did not report the right within the reporting period. On December 17, 2008, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership preservation under the Defendant’s name (hereinafter “registration of ownership preservation”) as of the land of this case under the receipt of No. 61481, Dec. 17, 2008, which was in the Suwon District Court No. 61481, Dec. 17, 2008.

On the other hand, J(J, K) that has the permanent domicile in I died on April 9, 1924, and the head of South L L became the heir of Australia and the property.

Since L was killed on August 9, 1993, and L was M et al., but the plaintiff was the inheritor of M et al. who died on August 24, 198.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 (including paper numbers), the fact inquiry results against the head of office office of Pyeongtaek-si in this Court, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Determination

A. A person registered in the Land Survey Book as a landowner is presumed to have been assessed as a landowner unless there is any counter-refluence, such as the change of the situation by the adjudication, and the circumstances are presumed to have been determined. The Addenda of the former Land Survey Decree (Ordinance No. 2 of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport No. 13, 1912) provides that “dispositions, speeds, and other actions conducted in accordance with the previous provisions shall be deemed to have been conducted in accordance with this Ordinance.” Thus, prior to the previous Land Survey Ordinance, a person registered in the