The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflected against the Defendant is favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, the defendant was under the control of the police due to the crime of 2017 senior group 1271 senior group, but he was under the control of the police immediately after the crime of 2017 senior group 2017 senior group 2552, causing traffic accidents in the course of the crime, and the fact that the period of the cancellation of the driver's license of the motor vehicle has considerably

Considering the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, family relations, sex conduct, environment, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime, it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, however, the first part of the judgment of the court below on the ground that the “E” in the first part of Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure was used as “F” and corrected as