Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant purchased an automobile, and disposed of it to lend cash.

On October 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) prepared an application for a new set of money to the effect that, even if the Defendant was granted a loan from the Defendant’s Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. to purchase the Mac-crack-cracking car, the Defendant would actually operate or own the Mac-cracking car; (b) would directly operate and own the said Mac-cracking car; (c) would receive a loan of KRW 40,000,000 from the Hyundai Capital Capital; and (d) deliver it to E who is an employee belonging to the Moc-cracking Agency and submit it to the said employee; and (d) then, the Defendant acquired it by means of having the victim approve the Defendant’s loan application and pay KRW 40,000,000 to the Hyundai Automobile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of selective fine for punishment (the following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 양형의 이유 벌금형의 선택에 따라 양형기준이 적용되지 아니하는 사안인바, 피고인은 대출브로커의 꾐에 빠져 이 사건 범행에 나아간 것으로 보이는 등 범행동기, 범행경위 및 편취금의 사용 등에 있어 참작할 만한 사정이 있는 점, 피고인에게는 동종 전과 뿐만 아니라 현재까지 어떠한 형사처벌을 받은 전력도 없는 점, 피고인은 피해자와 원만히 합의하였고, 피해자는 피고인에 대한 고소를 취소한 점, 피고인 가족 및 친족들의 피고인에 대한 선도의지가 강한 것으로 보이는 점,...