logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.06.28 2017구합86378
배분제외 처분 취소의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

. Each time was completed;

2) Meanwhile, on November 19, 2012, the Plaintiff completed the business registration for animal storage service business by making the instant store a place of business as the location of the business, but closed the business on November 5, 2014. On November 6, 2014, the Plaintiff closed the business registration for the oil storage service business at the above location, but closed the business registration for the oil storage service business on July 31, 2016.

8. Sale of each of the instant real estate units: 300,100,000 won and 22,230 won; 300,122,230 won and 11,209,730,400,408,400,408, 208, 306,40,400,400, 208, 305, 208, 306,40,40, 205, 30,000,000 won and 50,000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and 18,06,06,05,06,07,000,000

arrow