The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the form of a fine of 6 million won against the first crime as stated in the judgment of the court below, and the second crime as stated in the judgment of the court below are deemed to be unfair because the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for six months, forty hours, orders to complete sexual violence treatment programs, one year of employment restriction orders, and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the direct principle, should respect the determination of sentencing in cases where there exists a unique area of the first instance court, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court is not beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Even if the materials submitted in the trial at the trial, there is no significant change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and in full view of all the factors indicated in the records of this case, the lower court’s sentencing was unabundled and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.