logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.05.31 2017구합106113
도로점용허가신청 불허가처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. On September 22, 2017, the Defendant’s disposition of non-permission to occupy and use a road (connection) granted to the Plaintiffs is revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 10, 2015, the Plaintiffs issued the first application for the connection permission and non-permission disposition (1) to the head of the Seosan National Land Management Office for the extension of access roads to detached houses, “an application for the connection between roads and other facilities” with the intent to occupy and use D parts of the first line of the general national highway from August 1, 2015 to December 31, 2025, to establish access roads to detached houses.

According to the drawing attached at the time of the above application, the place where a general national highway 1 and a new access road are connected was planned to be a place where the intersection section of the general national highway 1 ends, and the said intersection was not scheduled to be installed as a transmission lane or the bridge at the said intersection.

(2) On August 21, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of nonpermission on the ground that the instant application falls under the prohibited section of the connecting permission pursuant to Article 6 of the Rules on Connection with Roads and other Facilities, on the ground that it is difficult for the Defendant to recognize the situation of entry into the front bank due to the roads adjacent to the said application (hereinafter “the first nonpermission disposition”).

Around November 2015, the Plaintiffs revised the plan to connect access roads by installing 20 meters in 17 meters away from the place where the above E-section ends, and 10 meters in the speed of the speed of the e-section, and subsequently, revised the plan to connect the two.

(2) On November 27, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-permission on the ground that the location of the said application to the Plaintiffs is adjacent to the first line Eth of a general national highway, and the risk of a traffic accident is increasing because the driver of the vehicle is difficult to become aware of the entrance and exit situation of the front line. The relevant section is higher than 30% in the share of bus and freight vehicles, and the traffic safety is anticipated at the time of a change in the vehicle line according to the combination and classification of vehicles (hereinafter “the second non-permission disposition”).

(j) 2.

arrow