logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.08.18 2015고단377 (1)
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 28, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) committed a violation of the victim F (26 years) and C before the victim F (26 years of age) around 12:50 on December 28, 2014, in collaboration with C, on the ground that he changed the victim F (26 years of age) before the victim’s “Ecafeteria” located D, and the Defendant took twice the victim’s face by drinking, and C took the victim’s face one time by drinking, and flae kne kne, which requires treatment for about 21 days.

Accordingly, the defendant, together with C, injured the victim.

2. The Defendant who injured the Victim G was under the influence of alcohol in the Victim G (20 years of age) who d'E cafeteria located in Sinpo-si around December 28, 2014, while drinking together in the Victim G (20 years of age).

For the reason that he saw, he saw the victim's face four times by drinking, embling the victim's fat, spathing the victim's chest by breathing it, and saw the victim's chest on two occasions by walking the victim's chest, thereby damaging the brue of the part that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, gambling, stuffing, etc.

3. On December 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties; (b) obstructed the victim H and I’s injury to the Defendant: (c) was arrested at the K box located in J on the charge of committing an act set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) and was under investigation on the charge of committing an act; and (d) was fluored with the head on the wall while taking a disturbance, and was under investigation, the Defendant she sawd the victim H’s bridge from the assistant victim H (44 years old); (d) was fluording the victim H’s bridge from the victim I (30 years old); and (e) continued to walk the victim’s bridge from the victim I (30 years old); and (e) was fluored from the victim I to the left-hand part of the victim’s Ha, who was in need of treatment on the left-hand side of the second week.

Accordingly, the defendant is justified in investigating the suspect arrested by the victims.

arrow