Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. With regard to the mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principle 1), the Defendant did not have any fact that the Defendant had a fluenced with the victim in the instant restaurant, and the Defendant merely flashed the victim by her hand in order to restrain the threat of the victim’s flag by putting the Defendant’s flag first, and was flaged by the Defendant. This constitutes legitimate self-defense as an inevitable act to protect the victim’s assault. 2) With regard to the injury, the Defendant, at the victim’s house, was flaged by the victim’s head first, and flaged by the victim’s head by flading the victim’s flag, thereby defending the fighting.

This constitutes legitimate self-defense as an inevitable act to defend the victim's assault.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below regarding the allegation of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, namely, ① the victim from the investigation stage to the court of the court of the court below, i.e., (i) at the restaurant located in Asan-si D around April 21, 2013 to the court of the court of the court below, i.e., (ii) she deposited her money after deducting the expenses of her early payment from her early 19:00, and (iii) the Defendant followed the Defendant, “I deposit her membership fee after deducting the expenses of her early her early flusium,” indicating that “I would have deposited her head with the Defendant “I may die the same flusium,” and (iv) the Defendant continued to have her head on the part of the victim’s hand, and followed the Defendant’s statement to the effect that “I would not know she would be a seed.”