The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to special intimidation 1), the Defendant only knife the knife the knife to defend himself, and did not have the intent of intimidation, and the victim did not feel the actual fear. As to the act of assaulting the victim H, there was no fact that the Defendant was supposed or caught by the victim.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (two months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below on the part of the special intimidation claim, it is reasonable to see that the defendant knife a knife and knife a knife as the victim E, the victim E knife a knife that the defendant knife a knife a knife that the defendant knife a knife a knife, and the defendant stated that "the defendant may knife a knife a knife a knife" at the time of the prosecutor's investigation, as the defendant knife a knife knife a knife, it cannot be said that the defendant had no intention to commit a special intimidation or self-defense. This part of the defendant's allegation of facts is without merit, considering the evidence duly adopted by the court below on the part of the crime of assault against the victim H.

B. The lower court’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing is to order the Defendant to suspend the commission of robbery.