Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2, 2012, around 11:30 on August 2, 2012, the Defendant was involved in the accident where the victim E(the age of 44) was driven by the Defendant in front of the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si C, Suwon-si, and the Defendant was driven by the victim E(the age of 44).

Therefore, when the victim photographs the damaged part of the accident vehicle that was lowered from the car, the defendant was the victim, and the victim was the victim's "Is to affix a photograph to the victim at the time of the accident."

After having expressed the victim's desire to "Sweak years, the same year, 200, 2000 .................., the Defendant used both arms to put the victim's shoulder, and put the victim into a light base for approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing suspect photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion on the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act stated that the defendant himself/herself was in excess of the victim, and there was no fact that the defendant himself/herself did not injure the victim, and that the victim's injury was in excess of the victim's light is against the rule of experience to the extent that natural healing is possible, and the victim's injury cannot be viewed as an injury under the Criminal Act. Thus, the victim stated that the victim was injured by the defendant's bodily injury, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i., the victim's statement that he/she was in excess of the victim's time, and the witness F was that the defendant's female behavior exceeded the victim's body.