1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 7, 2017, the party’s relevant network A died on February 5, 2018 when the instant lawsuit is pending as a person who undergone a general health examination conducted by Defendant F from the H department operated by Defendant G (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

Defendant B is the spouse of the network A, and Plaintiff C, D, and E are children of the network A.

B. 1) On January 10, 2017, the network A was provided with medical treatment with the content that “it is good, good, good,” at the Defendant Hospital. 2) On February 7, 2017, the network received a general health examination (hereinafter “instant medical examination”) from the Defendant Hospital on February 7, 2017, and on February 14, 2017, “I need to undergo a secondary medical examination of high blood pressure. I need to undergo a counseling and tracking examination with geological blood-related suspicions. I need to undergo a counseling and tracking examination.” In addition, the network A received a notice of the results of the health examination, “I will undergo a regular examination after one year, unless there is any special symptoms.” In addition, on February 22, 2012, the Defendant Hospital received an additional health examination to undergo an additional health examination of blood transfusion.”

3) Afterwards, on May 30, 2017, the Network A complained of the symptoms of “the embarrasses, semnasty, and hidden semnasty,” and was prescribed by the Defendant hospital by visiting the Defendant hospital. (c) On June 8, 2017, the 4th diagnosis network A was diagnosed with the 4th diagnosis of the pulmonary cancer at the International Hospital, and died on February 5, 2018. 【No dispute over the grounds for recognition, Party A’s evidence 1-2, Party A-2, Party A-1-2, Party 3-2, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. At the time of the examination of the plaintiffs' assertion, the net A complained of the inconvenience in the upper part at the time of the examination of the plaintiffs, and the chest X line suffered tuberculosis as a result of the examination of the chest X line, which increased to 11.78 Ng/L as a result of the examination of the CEA (AEA), and the 11.78 Ng/mL from the result of the examination of the AEA (AF), and the Defendants complaining of the difficult respiratory disorder again after the lapse of about three months, could have sufficiently doubtful the possibility of the network A's lung cancer outbreak.