The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

Around 09:00 on April 17, 2015, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts in the location where the victim E, who is the head of the above headquarters, has any particular debt relationship or has no bad credit status, even though the victim E, who is the head of the above company, has been gathered, the head of the headquarters, F, G, H, and I, is inside the business, and there is a debt relationship. The credit status is not good. If the Defendant does not work at a place operated by the above person, and only two are the same, the curriculum would be introduced to the F, G, H, and I, which is an employee of the above company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Investigation report (K Communications for Witnesses);

1. A credit information inquiry statement [The defendant and his defense counsel recognized the fact that the defendant made a statement as stated in the facts charged, but the above statement should be deemed a simple expression of opinion, and even if the statement of fact is a statement of fact, there was no false perception because it was true or believed to be true, and the illegality of the statement as stated in the facts charged is excluded as it is for the public interest of the DBBBBD employees or as an act that can be accepted by social norms. However, it is difficult to view it as a simple expression of opinion because it falls under a statement of specific past or current facts, and it is difficult to regard it as a simple statement of opinion, and it is a statement of specific facts. Also, the credit information inquiry statement against the victim (as a result, according to the evidence record No. 49) around April 2010.