logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.08 2015가합571351
손해배상(국)
Text

1. Defendant Republic of Korea shall pay Plaintiff J KRW 30,000,000 and the interest thereon from December 9, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs A, E, F, H, J, K, and N are located in the O of the Nanannam-gun, and the plaintiffs C were working without receiving any wage from each salt farm located in the Nannam-gun Pannam-do P, or detained, assaulted, etc. from salt farm owners (hereinafter referred to as " salt farm owners").

On January 28, 2014, two disabled persons who were suffering from the exploitation, confinement, assault, etc. of labor force in Q Q Q Q Q Q Q, were released to the police, and the similar cases that were practically conducted in the Japanese salt farm (hereinafter “steinty case”) were discovered. The plaintiffs were saved between the end of January 2014 and the end of April of the same year through the control, etc. conducted by the police of the Republic of Korea and the public officials of the Ministry of Employment and Labor after reporting the media.

B. Plaintiff A’s current status of damage, such as the exploitation of the Plaintiffs’ labor force, etc. (1) Plaintiff A) is a salt farm operated by the salt farm located in the Jeonnan-gun R, Jeonnam-gun, with the labor force taken from May 2004 to February 7, 2014.

B) From May 2004 to February 7, 2014, S was introduced the Plaintiff A (the age of 32 at that time) with the hearing disability of the state of delay in mental retardation even though he did not have a guardian from his name in the mutual influence in T at the Mapo-si Mapo-si Mapo-si, and with a view to communication, he received the introduction of the Plaintiff A (the age of 32 at that time) with the hearing disability of the state of delay in mental retardation, thereby inducing the Plaintiff to work in the salt farm and getting the Plaintiff to work in U.S. (C). The details of the damage, from May 2004 to February 7, 2014, the Plaintiff resided in S’s house and worked in the salt farm or dry field, and was not paid wages during the above period.

In addition, when the salt farm case was reported to the media, and the main investigation of the salt farm was conducted, it was confined to the officetels located from February 8, 2014 to the 18th day of the same month by S and his wife, which attempted to conceal crimes such as exploitation of labor force as above.

S. S.

arrow