The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The court below determined the above punishment against the defendant on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. The defendant shows an attitude against the defendant in a timely and consistent manner in all the crimes of this case; the defendant agreed with the victim E, L, and B; the defendant discharged part of the damage amount; and the victim O recovered most of the damage by completing the registration of transfer of ownership to Q Q in the land as stated in the judgment of the court below; and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment up to now, the defendant's assertion of the grounds favorable to sentencing in the court below seems to have been sufficiently considered while determining the punishment in the court below. There is no reason to view that the crime of this case was committed by the defendant as a reason favorable to sentencing in the court below, such as the fact that the crime of this case was committed by acquiring insurance money by the victim E who was judged bitamam in a large amount of 270 million won, and that the defendant exceeded the age, character, and conduct, the motive of the defendant's remaining victims except for the victim H until now, and thus, the court below's determination of punishment is too inappropriate.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.