The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (six months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant established 20 game machines which were not rated from November 17, 2013 to November 21, 2013, and provided them to customers for their use. The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflected the Defendant, and had no criminal record of having been sentenced to punishment for the same criminal record and suspension of qualification or heavier punishment.

However, in light of the seriousness of social harm and harm, such as encouraging a speculative spirit of the general public and undermining the desire to work, etc., the crime related to illegal game room business, such as the crime of this case, is deemed to be an inevitable reason for severe punishment. The defendant, who established and operated the above game room, has a heavy nature of the crime. Considering the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances of the crime, and the means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime were committed, it is difficult to see that the court below's punishment is excessively unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.