1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 25,786,950 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 5,016,60 to Plaintiff B; and (c) each of them, from February 1, 2017 to February 1, 2018.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) A project approval and public announcement of project approval - A road project name (C): - Public announcement of project approval: A project approval on December 29, 2014 - A public announcement of the Busan Regional Land Management Office - Project implementer: Defendant;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on December 8, 2016 (hereinafter “the instant ruling of expropriation”) - [Plaintiff A] and Port E (hereinafter “E”) - FY 4,193 square meters [Plaintiff B] and G field 198 square meters, H field 128 square meters, I field 1,615 square meters (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant lands”) - Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B: Total 367,327,200 won - Appraisal Corporation - Appraisal Corporation 367,327,200 won: 31 January 31, 2017 - An appraisal corporation and a unification corporation.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on May 25, 2017 - Contents of the ruling: The Plaintiffs’ objection is dismissed.

- Certified Public Appraisal Corporation: Samil Certified Public Appraisal Corporation, Stock Appraisal Corporation;

D. (1) The court's appraisal results showed that the sum of the difference by the plaintiff A 864,386,950,950,173,900 25,786,950 G 25,786,950 G 34,937,100 36,293,400 1,356,300 5,016,600 H 24,409,609,6024,678,678,40 I 268,80 I 307,980,300,311,372,003,391,50 / [25,780 of the appraisal results of each of the plaintiff's lands] The reasonable appraisal results of each of the plaintiff's lands as the appraisal results of the court's appraisal results of each of the above case's appraisal results of the plaintiff's 3081,2970

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, the purport of whole pleading

2. Determination on the plaintiffs' claims

A. The Plaintiffs asserted that the damages claim was withdrawn due to the decline in the value of the remaining land among the grounds for the claims stated in the complaint at the first date for pleading.

The amount of the adjudication on acceptance of this case is unfair for the following reasons.