logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.06.18 2020고단1797
야간건조물침입절도미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who served as an employee from October 3, 2017 to December 29, 2018, as the “Deputy Director” operated by the Victim C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.

1. Larceny;

A. On February 1, 2018, the Defendant thefted KRW 600,000,000,000 from that time by the same method until December 29, 2018, from that time, until December 29, 2018, by collecting the settlement money from the victim under the 3rd Deputy Office’s book.

B. On July 22, 2019, the Defendant stolen the victim’s property in a way that: (a) around 03:44 on July 22, 2019; (b) around 04:30 on the 28th of the same month; (c) around 03:04 on the 29th of the same month; and (d) at around three times on the 29th of the same month, he/she opened the said machine and opened the said machine as a key in the card board; and (b) up to five hundred thousand won in cash.

2. On March 23, 2019, the Defendant, who attempted to larceny at night buildings, was working in the office of the above senior secretary general on March 23, 2019, and intrudes into the office of the said senior secretary general, with a password that he/she became aware of while working in the office of the said senior secretary general, and had an employee reported that he/she had his/her employees who want to steal cash at a bank containing settlement money as described in the above paragraph 1(a) and did not go through an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation (a simple statement attached), a report on internal investigation (STV image verification), a report on internal investigation (to be accompanied by official documents), a report on investigation (to be heard the victim's telephone statement), and a report on investigation (to be submitted as suspect's

1. Relevant Articles 329 and 330 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 329 and 342 and 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is against the recognition of each of the crimes of this case, and the defendant is against the law.

arrow