Text
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged
1. At around 15:00 on April 25, 2019, Defendant A: (a) intending to build a crosswalk on the front of the water zone C, and the victim B (the age of 29) who was operating the D vehicle was able to walk on the road in front of the water zone C on the road; (b) kid the victim by the said vehicle; (c) kiding the victim by the said vehicle; and (d) kid the victim by the vehicle; (c) kid the victim’s face by the Defendant’s head; (d) kid the victim’s head, kid the victim’s face; and (e) kid the victim’s brea and bread the victim’s bridge part.
2. Defendant B was assaulted by the victim A (the age of 48) at the time, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1), and as seen above, the victim was satisfeed with her fat, her hand, was satched by satching the victim’s face by satisfing the victim’s satch, and committed assault against the victim by sating the bridge on the floor.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
(c) Each victim (each defendant) shall indicate his/her intention not to punish each other after the institution of public prosecution;
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;