A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 9, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “MMA”) driving a DMW car on around 22:26 March 2016, and driving a two-lane road in front of the building in Gangseo-gu Seoul Gangseo-gu, Seoul, into the erogate airbbing in the mouth of the mouth. In short, the Defendant neglected his/her duty of care to prevent accidents by using the steering gear and brakes well, and by negligence, he/she did not perform the duty of care to prevent accidents in the smoke, while he/she did not perform the duty of care to prevent the accidents by using the steering gear and brakes properly, the victim FF ( South, 49 years old) driving Gsch car in the front part of the above BMW car, which requires two-day medical treatment for the victim F. 1 week, and the e.g., the e., the e., g., the victim and the victim 77 weeks.

2. On May 9, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s Branch on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Seoul Central District Court’s District Court on January 7, 2013, respectively.

On March 9, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol in a non-permanent hospital that is linked to a village of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, etc. on March 23:39, 2016, the date and time specified in paragraph (1), such as drinking at a drinking-free engine and smelling in body, etc.

There is a considerable reason to doubt that the Seoul Gangseo Police Station's request for a drinking test was made by I, but the request for a drinking test was not complied with from that time until 23:59 on the same day without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;