The judgment below

The guilty part (including the acquittal part of the reason) shall be reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with labor for a year and for a fine of 30 million won.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A1) misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles, Defendant B lent money to B on or around January 2009, and Defendant B has consistently repaid this money as shown in attached Table 1 (i). The lower court found Defendant A1 guilty of the acceptance of bribe with respect to the money listed in attached Table 10 to 20, although there is no reason to determine differently the nature of the money listed in attached Table 1 to 9 and the money transferred on the date and time of the remaining order, there is no reason to determine differently from that of the money listed in attached Table 1 to 9. The lower court found Defendant A1 guilty of the receipt of bribe with respect to the money listed in attached Table 10 to 10 to 20, and the lower court erred by misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles as to the establishment of the crime of acceptance of bribe. 2) The sentence sentenced by the lower court

나. 피고인 B 1) 사실오인, 법리오해 피고인은 2009. 1.경 A으로부터 1,500만 원을 차용하였고, 그 후부터 틈틈이 A의 계좌로 금원을 송금하여 차용금을 변제하였을 뿐이고, A으로부터 북한이탈주민의 주소 정보를 알아낸 사실이 없으며, 그 명목으로 금원을 송금한 사실도 없다. 피고인이 구속되어 있는 기간 동안 탈북 브로커 일을 대신한 K, J이 A에게 연락하여 몇 명의 북한이탈주민의 주소지를 알아내기는 하였으나, 이는 별도의 대가 약속이나 지급 없이 인간적인 친분관계로 알아낸 것이다. 2) 양형부당 원심이 선고한 형(벌금 500만 원)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

C. A prosecutor 1) misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles) Defendant A’s acceptance of bribe, and the account transaction between Defendant A, Defendant B, J (EA), and K (spouse’s spouse) of the offering of bribe in the case of the offering of bribe in the case of this case. According to the account transaction between Defendant B, Defendant B, and Defendant B, the fact that the amount specified as the offering of bribe in the case of this case is recognized, the conversation between Defendant B, BG (the mother of Defendant B) and the prison, and the conversation between Defendant B and Defendant A and the prison, respectively.