All appeals filed by prosecutors and defendants are dismissed.

1. Regarding the summary of the grounds for appeal, the prosecutor asserts that the defendant's punishment (eight months of imprisonment) declared by the court below is too unfasible and unfair, and the defendant asserts that it is too unfair.

2. We also examine the judgment prosecutor and the defendant's argument of unfair sentencing.

The crime of this case was committed by a shouldered softener who is a dangerous object of the defendant, and the head of the victim was marked and the side part of the victim was faced with multiple cores, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment, and thus, the criminal liability of the defendant is not minor.

The defendant has been guilty of violence and has not been agreed with the victim until now.

However, it is against the defendant's confession.

There is no criminal record exceeding a fine, and there is no record of criminal punishment after June 2012.

The crime of this case was committed contingently.

Taking into account such circumstances as the age, conduct of sex, relationship with victims, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is appropriate.

It is not recognized that it is too poor or too poor.

3. If so, the appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.