1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 14, 2010, the Defendant is the executor of the Namyang-si Housing Project (hereinafter “instant Project”) publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on September 17, 2010, and the approval and public notice of the housing development plan and the conversion of the Bogeumjari Housing Zone.

On February 15, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a compensation agreement with the Defendant on the instant housing as the owner of the E-ground housing (hereinafter “instant housing”) located within the instant business zone in Namyang-si.

Title: The following matters are determined as disqualified as a result of the examination of relocation measures for the area of public housing in the area of Namyang-ju as a result of the examination of relocation measures for the area of public housing in the area of Namyang-ju as a result of the examination of relocation measures for the area of public housing:

1. If an objection is raised as a result of the review of the measures for resettlement, the principal time is determined by submitting written objections, explanatory materials, etc. by no later than 6 p.m. on September 2, 2016, and the result of the trial at the time of an application for non-performance within the same time period.

3. A revocation suit may be instituted within 90 days from the date on which he/she becomes aware of a disposition, etc. under Article 20 of the Administrative Litigation Act regarding the results of the review.

- A person subject to relocation measures - A person who has owned a legitimate house in the project district and has resided continuously in the project district (or the date of adjudication of expropriation) before the date of public inspection and publication of the residents (one year prior to the date of the conclusion of the compensation contract (one year prior to the date of the adjudication of expropriation) and has moved to the country after receiving compensation for the house due to the implementation of the project (excluding the owner of an unauthorized building, corporation or organization after January 25, 1

B. On July 28, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff did not meet the criteria for persons subject to relocation measures, thereby making it disqualified (hereinafter “instant disqualified notification”).

No. : The result of the review of the objection to the relocation measures is known to us as follows with the result of re-examination of the objection to the shipment request.

Results of review: Grounds for non-existence of relocation measures: