logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.01.09 2013고단4261
보건범죄단속에관한특별조치법위반(부정의료업자)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and fine for 2,00,000 won, and by imprisonment for 8 months and fine for 500,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On October 30, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (illegal Medical Service Providers) using disposable injection equipment at the “E” office for the operation of the Daejeon Jung-gu Daejeon District Office (Seoul) around 14:30 on October 30, 201, injecting the bitant injection amount to F, G, H, and name misstatement (i.e., the name “I”), a musta, etc., and the part of the selling base, etc., at the same place on November 30, 201, and received KRW 500,000,000,000 in total, respectively, from the same place.

As a result, the defendant was not a doctor but performed medical practice for profit.

B. In the case of treating the victim at a time and place like the preceding paragraph after being requested by the victim F (the age of 36) to remove her face, the defendant injured by occupational negligence was negligent in performing sex medical practice after completing regular courses and obtaining expertise and licenses necessary for the procedure, and thoroughly conducting disinfection of the medical institution so that the victim does not infected her germs, and after checking whether the victim has been suffering from pet diseases, he/she neglected his/her duty of care to conduct her surgery accurately according to medically verified and permitted methods, such as taking appropriate injection in accordance with the treatment register, selecting the method of treatment, etc., and taking the method of treatment, and neglecting the duty of care to conduct her surgery only once, and in addition, in the event that the victim cannot be aware of the number of days of treatment, the victim suffered from the change of her dysium and the injury of her infection.

2. Defendant B, with knowledge of the fact that the above Defendant did not intend to perform medical practice for profit-making purposes as set forth in the above 1-A, introduced the above F, etc., which frequently had access to the Defendant’s office as a matter of obligation, etc., to A, and thought to provide the place of practice.

The defendant is to A at the same time and place as the above 1 (a).

arrow