logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.10.20 2017고합94
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(알선수재)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for three years and fines of KRW 40 million, Defendant B’s imprisonment for one year, Defendant C’s imprisonment for one year, and Defendant C for one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, from January 18, 2016 to July 7, 2016, overall control over the duties of evaluating the personnel of police officials under his/her jurisdiction, recommending the commander of the Q police station, and investigating the case, etc., and transferred to the officer in charge of inspection of the National Police Agency around July 8, 2016, until December 11, 2016, Defendant A was in charge of inspection of police officers from around December 12, 2016 to around April 3, 2017.

Defendant

B The same year from January 18, 2016, while serving as the Head of Q Q Police Station (or Inspector).

7. Persons who assist the Defendant A from January 21, 201 to July 2, 201, who served as the S Police Station security leader from January 21, 2017.

1. Defendant A

A. On January 18, 2016, the Defendant was appointed to the head of QV police station located in the Gyeonggi Games on the acceptance of bribe related to personnel solicitation and the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (AEM). From that time to that time, the Defendant received a request from B to the effect that “if he/she was absent from the recent promotion, he/she has to be promoted at that time, he/she has to be promoted at that time,” and received KRW 10 million from B to the Defendant’s account around April 11, 2016, this part of the indictment that stated that “On April 20, 2016, the Defendant was released from the X-X entertainment station, and around June 30, 2016, the Defendant was released from the Defendant’s defense right to receive bribe and entertainment in the market price, respectively, within the same scope as the Defendant’s defense right to the acceptance of bribe and its ex officio.”

The Defendant, on July 8, 2016, was appointed as the inspector of the National Police Agency, and around that time, was called “B” to the effect that he asked U who was the latter head to have his personnel and asked him to do so, and thereafter, he was called “B” from “B.”

arrow