The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The sentencing of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following circumstances in determining the grounds for appeal, the Defendant’s assertion is with merit, since the lower court’s sentence imposed on the Defendant is deemed unreasonable.

The Defendant’s appeal on March 3, 201 is justified, and the lower court’s judgment is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the case is remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion. In so doing, it is so decided as follows.

[Dao-written judgment] The criminal facts and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence are identical to each corresponding column of the judgment of the court below, except for the correction as follows. Thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Part 31 Rad.

Paragraph 1), 2), and 3’s each “CC” were corrected to “A Q” respectively, and Article 50 of the summary of the evidence 2014 high group3289, Paragraph 5 of the revised Act and subordinate statutes apply to “each loan transaction agreement” as “each loan transaction agreement.”

1. Each of the above Articles 231 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense (the fact that Article 231 of the relevant Act was committed around January 24, 2011; around July 28, 2011; around May 18, 2013; and around May 2013); Articles 231 and 30 of the Criminal Act (excluding the fact that Article 231 of the aforementioned private documents was committed); Articles 234 and 231 (excluding the fact that Article 235 of the above private documents was committed); around 203; around 25, 201; around January 25, 201; around July 29, 201; around March 18, 2013; and the fact that Article 231 and 34 of the above private documents were committed from around May 29, 2013; and the fact that Article 231 of the above private documents were committed from around 2013.5;