1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 172,772,628 and KRW 136,416,428 from May 11, 2006 to August 2006.

1. In full view of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5 as to the cause of the claim, the non-party Small and Medium Business Corporation filed an application with the Seoul Southern District Court for a payment order seeking a loan against the defendants. The above court decided on May 29, 2006 that "the defendant jointly and severally pays 189,528,780 won and delay damages for 153,172,580 won" (No. 2006 tea 10387), the above payment order was finalized on August 29, 2006 and the Small and Medium Business Corporation transferred the claim based on the above payment order, and notified the defendants thereof.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the same amount as the written order to the plaintiff among the claims based on the above payment order, as requested by the plaintiff.

2. The Defendants asserted that the statute of limitations has expired for the instant claim. As seen earlier, the payment order was finalized on August 29, 2006 with respect to the instant claim, and the instant lawsuit was filed on July 26, 2016, which was ten years after the lapse of the ten-year period thereafter, and thus, the instant claim cannot be deemed to have expired by the statute of limitations.

Therefore, the defendants' assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.