logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.05.02 2011고합728
존속살해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant visited the victim’s house by visiting the victim’s house by looking away from the beginning of the 20th century, among the male and female of the victim E (n, 74 years old).

However, since August 201, the Defendant aggravated the health condition of the victim with a physical disability in the sixth degree since the police officer in the middle of August 201, and thus, the victim was unable to move without being married. Since F, a female son of the Defendant, divorced and raises three children to neglect, the victim cannot be considered for a long period of time. As there is no person to look at the victim, the Defendant went into the house of the victim in the first floor in the Sungnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-gu, and led the victim to live together with the victim.

The defendant, while living together with the victim, returned to the plan that the victim would change the diapers into the diapers by themselves, and even though the victim speaks several times to ask the diapers in the floor, the defendant was in a clean nature as the defendant who returned to the room floor when she continuously wurds the diapers.

In addition, around September 18, 201, the Defendant discovered 1.2 million won, the victim was in custody of the house and deposited it in the Defendant’s passbook. On September 19, 201, the next day, the Defendant demanded a return of 1.2 million won to the victim around September 19, 201, and the Defendant used 13,500 won of the victim, and the victim used 135,000 won, and demanded a return to the victim. On the other hand, the Defendant’s female student F or caregiver, who was in charge of the passbook and money of the victim, did not believe that the victim was in trust and trusted by F or caregiver, who is the female student of the Defendant.

At around 16:00 on September 25, 201, the Defendant confirmed that 90,000 won when the victim was kept in custody of the Defendant was sent to the Defendant’s mother F.

arrow