logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.29 2013가단5125769
손해배상(산)
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 13,307,91 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from February 14, 201 to January 29, 2015 for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B is a person engaged in landscaping business in the name of E in both weeks, and Defendant C is a F accusation vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “instant vehicle”), and the accusation vehicle is a working unit (bellet or floshes) to which the work owner may escape.

) It is an owner of a vehicle with a equipment to increase or lower working costs, which is used for the purpose of carrying out work in a high place by getting on and off his or her platform.

B. On February 14, 201, the Plaintiff was paid daily allowances from Defendant B, and was employed by Defendant B, and was engaged in a flusium work (hereinafter “instant work”).

At the time of the instant work, Defendant C stopped the said vehicle at the place where the instant work was conducted by driving the instant vehicle and stopped the said vehicle at the place where it was conducted, and thereafter, 3-4 meters high from the work site, which is the work site, the Plaintiff, who was the work site, increased the work site at the height of 3-4 meters. The Plaintiff operated the fixed device server in the work site to set the work site, and then saw saw saw saw.

C. At the time of the instant work, there was a flagpole in the vicinity of the Posty tree. However, on February 14, 201, when the Plaintiff performed the Mosium work, the Glusium cut down around 10:00 on February 14, 201, and the Glusium cut down below the Mosium, leading to a change in the direction of the Mosium, and led to the shock of the Plaintiff from the workplace.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the left-hand pelke, etc. due to the said accident.

At the time of the instant work, the Plaintiff did not receive a safety cap and safety belt from Defendant B, and before the work, the Plaintiff did not receive safety education related to the filing of a complaint from Defendant B and the work team in the workplace.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, and Eul evidence 1.

arrow