logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.04.17 2017가단19069
상속채무금
Text

1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network E to the Plaintiff

A. Defendant A is 32,549,198 won and 12,684.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the change in the specification of the claim;

(4) However, the Plaintiff changed the “the delivery date of a duplicate of the complaint” against Defendant A from the damages for delay to the “the delivery date of a duplicate of the complaint” to the “the delivery date of a duplicate of the petition for modification of the claim” and the “the delivery date of a duplicate of the complaint” against Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D, respectively.

A. Judgment by deeming the confession against Defendant A, Defendant C, and Defendant D (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

B. Judgment on Defendant B by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

arrow