Text
1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network E to the Plaintiff
A. Defendant A is 32,549,198 won and 12,684.
Reasons
1. The description of the grounds for the change in the specification of the claim;
(4) However, the Plaintiff changed the “the delivery date of a duplicate of the complaint” against Defendant A from the damages for delay to the “the delivery date of a duplicate of the complaint” to the “the delivery date of a duplicate of the petition for modification of the claim” and the “the delivery date of a duplicate of the complaint” against Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D, respectively.
A. Judgment by deeming the confession against Defendant A, Defendant C, and Defendant D (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)
B. Judgment on Defendant B by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)