A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

An order the accused to take a lecture for sexual assault treatment for 40 hours.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant 2016 Highest 267 on December 3, 2015, at the J convenience store located in the Northern-gu I in Yancheon-si, Yancheon-si, Yancheon-si, Gyeongcheon-gu, 2015.

G (Woo, 18 years old) and take the flabs after setting the flabs in front of K (Woo, 18 years old).

Patently engaged in obscene acts, such as committing self-defense.

The Defendant of the 2016 Highest 407, May 18, 2016, at the “M convenience store” located in Boan-si L around 19:00 on May 18, 2016, in front of the victim N (V, 19 years of age).

Patently engaged in obscene acts, such as committing self-defense.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 order 267]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of K andO;

1. A photograph of a CCTV closure (2016 top 407 top 407);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to the N;

1. Application of 13 of the Act and subordinate statutes on the screen by 8 on-site photographs and by capturing CCTVs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 245 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime. Article 245 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed by an Order to Attend the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc.”) has been punished by a fine for the same offense in 2014, and continues to repeat the same offense even though the Defendant has been punished again for the same offense in 2016.

It appears that there are many crimes that have not been a criminal case (the 2016 Highest 267 highest 267 highest 3rd, 30th) and the defendant committed a second offense before the date of a sentence after the closure of pleadings and tried to keep the defendant under separate detention. The defendant's risk of recidivism is very high.

I seem to appear.

Although the defendant should recognize the military register status and endeavor to prevent re-offending, according to the opinion of the doctor submitted during the trial process, since the defendant visited the hospital intermittently and appears to lack active treatment intent, he/she shall be sentenced to a sentence (no statutory detention shall be imposed on the defendant, since he/she is under separate detention): Provided, That this shall not apply to the defendant's age is lower and the punishment history of the above fine.