logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.10.16 2017고정379
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who franchising a pact, such as raising trial expenses, etc., at C dan located in B at a leisure time, and the police officer dispatched after being reported at around 22:39 on June 12, 2017 (number 1449) and being dispatched on around 112:39 on June 12, 2017 intends to return the defendant to the defendant, the defendant is a person who was posted with a franchis with a franchis, etc., in the case where the police officer, who was dispatched after being dispatched at around C 3:50 on the same day, intends to return the defendant to the defendant.

The Defendant, at around 22:52 on June 12, 2017, was only a few dysty in front of the C dan, which is located in B, and on the ground that the police officer issued a penalty Stick on the ground that the police officer issued the penalty Stick, the Defendant escorted D to the police officer who caused the crime of bitch bitch bitch of the police officer who caused the crime.

Before the 1st century, the term “nicking,” “nicking,” etc., was expressed by the victim E., and “nicking” was stamped by the victim police officer E.

C. Epronia, Nymania, Nymania, the Republic of Korea is not a human flachie.

It is the case where a police officer openly insults a police officer by referring to his her crypt, such as the cryp gueste.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act recognizes and reflects his/her mistake. However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all the various sentencing conditions recorded in the records of the instant case, including the background leading to the instant crime, the content and degree of insult.

arrow