Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor or two years of suspended sentence for larceny by the District Court of the Republic of Korea on September 22, 2015, and the said judgment becomes final and conclusive on October 1, 2015, and is currently under suspended sentence
[2016 Highest 4782]
1. Larceny;
A. On June 15, 2016, around 23:30 on June 15, 2016, the Defendant stolen the victim’s door door of the 1st E unit by typing the victim’s room located in the 6th floor by using the cres or cres within the victim’s room.
B. On September 3, 2016, from around 02:00 to around 03:00 to around 03:0, the Defendant stolen the victim’s “G music shop” on the first floor of the F-Si, Seocheon-si, by taking advantage of the gaps of the victim’s H, the victim’s market price in an amount of KRW 1,00,000,000, the victim’s market price on the spot was over a sofa, with one cellphone of 6:0 smartphone.
2. On June 19, 2016, at around 01:19, the Defendant infringed on a structure: (a) opened an entrance with the aforementioned key, which was stolen, as described in paragraph (a) of Article 1, and entered into the entrance, as the victim I’s operation E; (b) around 01:43, Jun. 20, 2016, the Defendant: (c) opened the entrance to the said key; (d) opened the entrance; and (e) intruded the structure at night; and (e) opened the entrance with the key as described in paragraph (a) of Article 1; and (e) opened the entrance with the door cut as one of the two,132,70 won owned by the victim; and (e) stolen the structure at night, the Defendant dived the structure by using any cresh in which the victim I was on the first floor in Dongducheon-si, Dok-si, Dok-si; and (e) cut the structure by putting four plastic bags with the victim’s.
Accordingly, the defendant invadedd a structure at night and stolen the victim's property.
[2017 Highest 767] On November 10, 2016, the Defendant posted an article stating that “The Defendant sells a single child’s white paper and a new product from a single child’s white paper” on the Internet NAV online, thereby making a false statement to the victimJ, who reported and contacted the article.
However, the defendant does not have the above goods.