The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below against the defendant in light of the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the defendant had no criminal records above the judgment are favorable to the defendant. However, in this case, the defendant was dissatisfied with the defendant's report on his own as a assault case, and the defendant was able to request the sale of the above house to the real estate brokerage office in order to move together with the entrance of the house where the victim was living, and the victim was frighted to get out of the house, and the victim was frighted to get out of the house, and the defendant was frighted with the victim's house while the victim was being investigated about the above act, and the crime was very poor because the crime was found in the house of the victim while the victim was being investigated, and the crime was very poor, and the victim was found to have suffered from severe mental pain. However, the defendant's request for sale of the above house to the real estate brokerage office for the purpose of moving together with the defendant, and the defendant did not take any measures to recover damage to the victim, the records and circumstances of the defendant's criminal records, the motive and circumstances of the crime of this case, and the sentencing of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.