logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.08.24 2017고단1453
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 13, 2017, the Defendant received a report on the cancellation column 112, and received a demand from a police officer E, a police officer, and a police officer of the Ulsan-dong Police Station D who called to the site on April 13, 2017 to pay the drinking value. The Defendant did not pay the drinking value.

Chewing farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch

F The second instance assaulted the F's second instance by generating it once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers on the 112 reporting handling duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition. Article 40 (Selection of Punishment of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommended punishment] There is no basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the person subject to special sentencing) (the judgment of sentence / the person subject to special sentencing) of the type 1 (the interference with the performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties) (the decision of sentence / The defendant has the same kind of violent crimes against the defendant, and the degree of abusive and assault at the time of interference with the performance of official duties is very unfavorable.

However, in consideration of the fact that the defendant shows an attitude to reflect in depth on the crime, and that the defendant was a crime committed under the influence of self-control under the influence of alcohol, the punishment shall be determined as per the order.

arrow