The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the event of mistake of facts, emergency evacuation, and legitimate act, there is no need for relief of the victim at the time of the instant accident, and there was no intention of escape. Furthermore, the Defendant’s leaving the scene is to treat the children showing symptoms of liver quality, and thus, illegality is dismissed as it constitutes an emergency evacuation or a justifiable act.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (five million won by fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below to determine the assertion of mistake of facts, emergency evacuation, and legitimate act: ① the defendant was driving the road of this case while driving the road of this case, and was driving the vehicle of this case first to show the victim's personal information, etc.; ② the defendant was driving the vehicle of this case to the victim's end that the victim did not have any pen, and ② although the defendant did not have any unit of fire insurance, he did not have any unit of the vehicle of this case, he did not inform the victim of the details of the specific purchase of the insurance contract at the time of the accident of this case, he was aware of the victim's accident, and left the site without notifying the victim of the details of the insurance contract at the time of the accident of this case. ③ The victim's vehicle of this cannot be seen as having been merely leaving the site without notifying the victim. ③ The physical damage easily confirmed as the land as the victim's engine was caused by the accident of this case, and the victim had been confirmed as to the personal damage of the victim of this case relatively old age.

With regard to the circumstances in which an accident occurs and leaving the site, the defendant's assertion is livered by children.