1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for this case are as follows, except where the court additionally added, changed, or deleted as follows and added the judgment as to the plaintiff's argument in the trial of the court of first instance, and this case is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The plaintiff alleged that "the plaintiff has lent living capital to the defendant," 15 of the 4th 4th 15th 15th 15th 4th 2th 3th 17th 18th 3th 17th 18th 2th 6th 6th 4th 4th 6th 6th 6th 2th "the plaintiff's additional assertion that "the plaintiff was claiming that "(B) was given a loan to the defendant" was added after the 4th 16th 4th 16th 16th 5th 5th 5th "(B)" was "the plaintiff's additional assertion that "the plaintiff" was changed to "the defendant," even if the claim under the loan agreement of this case constitutes commercial credit, the plaintiff did not claim that the 6th 1th 13th 209 3th 201th 13th 200.

If a creditor participates in a compulsory auction by exercising his/her right by means of demand for distribution, report on a claim, etc., and the distribution schedule is prepared as a part of a claim interrupted by the exercise of his/her right to distribute a part of the claim interrupted by the extinctive prescription, and again there has been an objection to a distribution only against a part of the dividend amount, and in other words, the remaining part of the dividend amount excluding the part becoming the object of objection and the distribution schedule of the portion not distributed became final and conclusive, thereby, the exercise of his/her right to that portion, which became final and conclusive