logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.14 2014고단6752
공용서류손상등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 9, 2014, the Defendant damaged public documents within the Daegu Middle-gu Police Station and the Criminal Affairs Office located in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, about 55, in order to carry out an investigation and criminal guidance. Upon receiving 112 reports on the failure of an Uzbekistan, the Defendant: (a) accompanied the situation D, slope E belonging to the Daegu Middle-gu Police Station C District, and accompanied the said District to the said District to investigate the situation of the instant case; (b) opened the documents of “the occurrence of the instant case and the accompanying report” prepared by the said D, which was placed on the Gap table, on his/her hand; and (c) opened the documents, and (d) removed them, and damaged public documents, such as to tear the part of them.

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) at the above time and place of the injury, damaged the official document; and (b) at the slope F belonging to the above criminal community, caused the above F to enter the right side of the F.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of the case by the slopeF, which is a police officer, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim F (ma, 43 years of age) on the water by any other pet that requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (a point of damage to public documents), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment (such as: (a) the fact that one’s own revenue is against each other, supporting his or her family; (b) the fact that he or she seems to have been employed for and work for a domestic company in good faith; and (c) there is room to regard difficulty in communication due to language barriers to be somewhat contributed to the result of the crime);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act for the Detention of Labor House Head.

arrow