1. The judgment of the first instance court, including each selective claim added by this court, shall be modified as follows:

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) The Plaintiff is a person who engages in the export business of high-speed vehicles with the trade name of D. 2) The Defendant is a middle-speed trader who exports high-speed vehicles within the Republic of Korea to Russia and sells high-speed vehicles to Rusia.

3) The Selectioner shall be E (hereinafter referred to as “E”) conducting export clearance agency business for high-speed vehicles, etc. as part of the Russian nationality considered.

B) On December 2013, the Plaintiff is an employee of FF, a subsidiary company of F. (1) the Plaintiff exported modern metro truck of 5 tons, a Russia, a high-speed vehicle of Russia (G; hereinafter “1 vehicle”) and a tank of 8 tons modern frame (vehicle number: H: hereinafter “H; hereinafter “Nan large tank”) and the tank of 8 tons of modern frame, and entrusted the storage of the vehicle to L “L, a Russia, a Russia located in Blosia.”

2) Since then, the Plaintiff was under contact with L to the effect that it is no longer able to keep a vehicle any longer due to the discontinuance of the heavy-class trading business from L, and around August 2014, the Plaintiff entrusted the Defendant with the temporary registration certificate of the 1st vehicle and the modern tank lock, which was Russia, and had the Defendant keep it. 3) around that time, the Plaintiff requested a designated person to execute export clearance on behalf of the Plaintiff for the export clearance, thereby requesting treatment scar lock (hereinafter “second vehicle”) for the export declaration (A: I; hereinafter “second vehicle”) and the buyer column of the customer column and the export declaration completion certificate (A evidence 2-2) in Russia export declaration (A evidence 2-1). The Plaintiff entrusted the Defendant with the sale of the second vehicle.

[Plaintiff exported the vehicle in addition to the second vehicle at the time, treatment accelerator and modern tank 16 tons (16 tons). However, treatment accelerator and modern tank 16 tons (16 tons) were at the export stage, and they were returned by importing them. 4) The Defendant kept the first, the second, and the modern tank 1 in the parking lot managed by E. (c. 1) the vehicle was not sold, but the Plaintiff kept in E around May 28, 2015.