1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The facts based on which the Plaintiff received a certificate of borrowing from C on June 1, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant certificate of borrowing”) from the Defendant as the surety and remitted KRW 50,000,00 to C with the said certificate of borrowing as the surety may be acknowledged either as a dispute between the parties, or as a whole, by adding up the purport of the entire pleadings as stated in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2.

2. The plaintiff's assertion stated that "the defendant who has a real estate of KRW KRW KRW KRW 000,000 shall lend money to the plaintiff to the plaintiff together with C shall pay the guarantee to the defendant," and that the defendant shall acquire 50,000,000 from the plaintiff.

The defendant is liable to compensate for damages sustained by the plaintiff together with C.

3. The fact that the Plaintiff received a loan certificate from C and remitted KRW 50,000,00,000 as seen earlier, however, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant, along with C, made the statement to the Plaintiff as alleged above, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Rather, in addition to the contents of evidence Nos. 6 and 9, C’s name, etc. in the guarantor column of the instant loan certificate without obtaining the Defendant’s permission, and the Plaintiff was not deemed the Defendant at the time of drawing up the instant loan certificate and did not confirm the granting of authority to the Defendant.

The plaintiff's assertion based on the premise that the defendant deceivings the plaintiff with C is without merit.

4. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.