logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1963. 4. 4. 선고 63누19 판결
[행정처분취소][집11(1)행,098]
Main Issues

(a) Execution of a market price plan project under the old shipbuilding market plan and expropriation method of land and other things;

(b) Where the land which is the property devolvingd has been designated as a substitute for another land by land partition rearrangement, the validity of the lease disposal made by the authorities concerned for the previous land; and

Summary of Judgment

Where any property devolving upon the State is designated as a substitute for another land by the partition of land, the competent authorities shall not make a lease of the previous land.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 2(1), 4(1), 7(2), and 8(1) of the old Decree on the Market Price Planning of Shipbuilding

Plaintiff-Appellant

Brine machine

Defendant-Appellee

Daejeon Secretary-General;

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 62Gu71 delivered on December 26, 1961

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

However, according to the evidence of the court below, if the land was constructed in accordance with the above 68-2 piece of land within the boundary of the adjoining urban planning zone, and the land was disposed of in accordance with the above 195.5.19, the land was disposed of in the 1952.4.12, and the land was disposed of in the 1952.4.14.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.66.666.66.66.666.66.666.66.666.666.666.66.66.

The judge of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) Ma-Ma-man (Presiding Judge) Ma-man Ma-man Ma-man Ma-man Ma-man Ma-man

arrow